Author : Jordan Allison Authors Info & Claims
Article No.: 26, Pages 1 - 30 Published : 08 June 2023 Publication History 1 citation 448 Downloads Total Citations 1 Total Downloads 448 Last 12 Months 269 Last 6 weeks 19 Get Citation AlertsThis alert has been successfully added and will be sent to: You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.
To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below. Manage my AlertsAs technology and curricula continue to evolve and develop, the prevalence and effectiveness of continuing professional development (CPD) opportunities for computer science teachers is becoming increasingly more important. However, key questions remain about what the characteristics are for effective CPD in this context. Through the presentation of existing literature and the qualitative analysis of interviews with 32 employees from 13 English colleges (n = 14 computer science lecturers, 10 course leaders, and 8 members of senior leadership) this article answers the following question: ‘What are the characteristics of effective continuing professional development for computer science teachers in the 16-18 sector?’ Existing literature indicates how CPD benefits from: (1) knowledge development and application to classroom teaching, (2) self-efficacy development and measurement, (3) observation, feedback and reflection, (4) collaboration and communities of practice, (5) sufficient time, and (6) institution support. Meanwhile, the thematic analysis of interview data led to the creation of five overarching themes: (1) computer science CPD should address various knowledge domains, (2) CPD requires institutional support, (3) CPD should be engaging, (4) computer science CPD should involve a combination of activities, and (5) CPD should be measurable. This qualitative article also presents interview excerpts and contributes to computing education research and practice by presenting a set of thirty guidelines which outlines the characteristics of effective CPD in the context of computer science teachers in the 16-18 sector. These guidelines could be beneficial for both CPD providers and educators in ensuring CPD opportunities are designed more effectively, and with an understanding of both parties’ needs.
Jordan Allison. 2020. A framework for effective continuing professional development: The case of computer science teachers within further education colleges. In 2020 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI). IEEE, 898–903.
Michal Armoni. 2011. Looking at secondary teacher preparation through the lens of computer science. ACM Transactions on Computing Education 11, 4 (2011), 1–38.
Emily J. Armstrong. 2019. Maximising motivators for technology-enhanced learning for further education teachers: Moving beyond the early adopters in a time of austerity. Research in Learning Technology 27, 2032 (2019).
Association of Colleges. 2018. AoC College Workforce Survey 2017: Summary of Findings. Association of Colleges, London.
Association of Colleges. 2019. Skills Shortages and Funding Gaps: An Analysis of the Costs of Under-investment in Skills. Technical Report. Association of Colleges, London.
Philip Augar, Ivor Crewe, Jacqueline de Rojas, Edward Peck, Beverley Robinson, and Alison Wolf. 2019. Review of Post-18 Education and Funding. Department for Education, London.
